ABCT Spiritual & Religious Issues Special Interest Group

SIG Poster Session 2012

The following posters will be presented at this year's SIG Poster Session - Friday, November 16th, 2012, 6:30-8:30pm
- The Faith Situations Questionnaire - William L. Hathaway
- Wall Street: Aggression Never Sleeps - Gautam Bhasin, et al.
- Biblical Application to Spiritually Augmented Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - Rev Joseph P. Chacko
- Does social context moderate the relationship between religiosity and psychological adjustment? - Steven Pirutinsky, et al.
- Religiosity among Adolescent Sex Offenders - Nicole German, et al.

Annual SIG Meeting

Thursday, November 15, 2012, 6:30-8:00pm
Keynote Address
- Steven Hayes, Ph.D. (University of Nevada, Reno) - Spirituality & The Science of CBT
Rapid-Fire Talks
- William L. Hathaway, Ph.D. (Regent University) - The Faith Situations Questionnaire as an Assessment & Treatment Planning Tool
- Nicole German (Auburn Univeristy) - Religiosity among Adolescent Sex Offenders

Join Today

With over 175 members, we are one of the largest SIGs in ABCT.

Please click here to join.

Why Are Spirituality & Religion Important For Psychology?

A recent Gallup Poll (2010) reported that 54% of a representative sample in the United States indicated that spirituality and religion are very important in their own lives.

A rich body of empirical literature has tied spirituality/religion to psychological health. In one recent systematic review of 850 studies, 80% demonstrated positive relationships between spiritual/religious beliefs and practices and greater life satisfaction (Koenig and Larson, 2001), and nearly two thirds of studies found that spiritual/religious individuals experienced lower rates of anxiety and depression.

Consistent evidence also indicates that spirituality/religion play a vital resource in the process of coping with psychological distress for many individuals (Pargament, 1997).

A burgeoning literature highlights the importance of integrating spirituality into psychotherapy (Pargament, 2007).

The Relationship Between the Field of Psychology & Spirituality

Psychology and mental health disciplines have shied away from the study of spiritual issues as they relate to basic and applied research. As a result, many questions about the relevance of spirituality/religion to human psychology remain unanswered. For example:

What are the mechanisms by which this domain relates to human anxiety, depression and other symptoms? How can patient spirituality be integrated into evidence-based treatments? When should this be facilitated, and how might doing so impact treatment efficacy and treatment dissemination?

Without evidence-based answers to these questions, most clinicians are never trained in basic core competencies in how to assess for and address patient spirituality in treatment (Pargament, 2007).

A responsible, scientific framework is needed to examine human spirituality in the context of modern psychology.

Advances in the Area of Psychology and Spirituality/Religion

While most existing spiritually integrated treatments have not been cognitive-behavioral in modality, several successful attempts have integrated spirituality and religion into cognitive behavioral and rational-emotive behavioral therapy (e.g., Johnson, DeVries, Ridley, Pettorini, & Peterson, 1994; Propst, Ostrom, Watkins, Dean, & Mashburn, 1992; Azhar, Varma & Dharap, 1994; Nielsen, Johnson, & Ellis, 2001).

Spiritually-integrated cognitive behavioral therapy (SI-CBT) is similar to conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) except that the rationale for treatment is presented in a spiritual framework, and selected religious beliefs are utilized to counter maladaptive beliefs (Robb, 1988; Nielsen, 2001).

Spiritual/religious practices can be purposefully included in treatment as behavioral activation strategies with the intention of increasing positive emotions such as gratitude and hope (Paukert, et al., 2009).

While research on treatments is still in its early stages, more than 30 clinical trials have been conducted, including several prominent randomized controlled studies (e.g., Propst, Ostrom, Watkins, Dean, & Mashburn, 1992; Rye, et al., 2005; Oman Hedberg & Thoresen, 2006; Wachholtz & Pargament, 2009; see Hook, et al., 2009 for a review).